Description

文学研究者对小说中主角判断的方法，是统计其名字出现的次数，谁出现的

次数最多，谁就是主角。假设小说中引用的人名前都有@引导。对于下面这篇两

个段落的短文，其主角便为Thackeray。

Several pages before the novel actually ends, @Thackeray writes a fake

 ending, to satirize conventional happy endings. He deliberately

throws in a repetitious series of cliches often used for endings–the

vessel is in port, the hero gets what he yearned for all his life,

and the bird comes home and sits on his shoulder billing and cooing.

Then @Thackeray prose swells into a crescendo of sentimentality and

more repetition: "This is what he has asked for every day and hour

for eighteen years. This is what he pined after. Here it is–the summit,

the end–the last page of the third volume". Then he bids goodbye to

@Dobbin and @Amelia , and of course slips in the reference to her as

a parasite. The repetition points up the lack of real meaning and the

indulgence of emotion for its own sake. Unwary readers, in his day

and ours, accept his statement and emotion at face value, ignore the

parasite reference, and so miss the satire. Not even the fact that

the novel was published in two volumes, not three, alerted some of

his contemporaries. The style and sentimentality of @Thackeray false

ending are similar to passages that @Dickens wrote.

为简化处理，假定人名后面不会跟标点符号，也不会跟后缀所有格或复数形式，

且不会出现多个主角或没有主角的情况。你的任务是确定每篇小说中谁是主角。

Input

今有若干篇小说，每篇小说以#为结束（文中不会出现#）。

Output

输出每篇小说的主角名字，每个名字占一行。

Sample

Input

Several pages before the novel actually ends, @Thackeray
 writes a fake ending, to satirize conventional happy endings. 
He deliberately throws in a repetitious series of cliches 
often used for endings–the vessel is in port, the hero gets 
what he yearned for all his life, and the bird comes home and 
sits on his shoulder billing and cooing. Then @Thackeray has 
prose swells into a crescendo of sentimentality and more 
repetition: "This is what he has asked for every day and hour
 for eighteen years. This is what he pined after. Here it is–the 
summit, the end–the last page of the third volume". Then he 
bids goodbye to @Dobbin and @Amelia , and of course slips in 
the reference to her as a parasite. The repetition points up 
the lack of real meaning and the indulgence of emotion for 
its own sake. Unwary readers, in his day and ours, accept his 
statement and emotion at face value, ignore the parasite 
reference, and so miss the satire. Not even the fact that the 
novel was published in two volumes, not three, alerted some 
of his contemporaries. The style and sentimentality of 
@Thackeray false ending are similar to passages that @Dickens 
wrote.
#

Output

Thackeray